Why can't we just have a bake sale?

I've attended 2 budget committee meetings this week and I have a few thoughts to share:

• Someone needs to explain the preschool program at the Elementary School to Russ Simon. And not just the preschool program at the school, but preschool in general. It's been a long time since some of the Budget Committee members have had kids in Pre-K, and my guess is that maybe things have changed a little. I really wanted to raise my hand and explain how it works. For the record, we've attended both a private Pre-K and utilized the Pre-K at the elementary school due to my son having an IEP, so I think I have a pretty well-rounded perspective. Just the hint that the Pre-K at the elementary school might need to be "looked at" because revenue is down, shows that the Budget Committee members don't understand the program. 

• It's no secret that the majority of the budget is salaries - 81% according to Dr. Hayes. Last night Roseanne Kwaks complained that "the kids are only getting 20 cents on the dollar." Does she not realize that teachers teach kids?

• There's been a lot of talk about needs vs. wants. A little at the Budget Committee meeting, but also quite a lot on Facebook. Is only meeting the minimum standards where we want to be? What does this say about our priorities? Hiding behind fiscal responsibility and suggesting that anything above the bare minimum is the Taj Mahal is a disgrace. I expect more from our elected officials. 

• Dr. Hayes needs to do a better job explaining his plans for technology in our schools. I don't know what back-up data the Budget Committee has or doesn't have, but it was clear that they didn't understand the request for the iPads and how it fits into the bigger picture for the district. Not to mention, as a parent I think that it's exciting to hear about those plans for the schools and it makes me feel like we're headed in the right direction.

The Budget Committee will meet again on January 7th and 8th. At those meetings, the Budget Committee will ask any further questions of both the Town and the School and also discuss the proposed warrant articles. There will be time for public input at a hearing scheduled for January 14th. 

Mark your calendars.

Powerless

Yes, I believe this is about guns. 

Here are some of the issues taken up during the last legislative session in New Hampshire as reported by Granite State Progress:

• whether to allow someone who was denied a handgun license to petition directly to the Superior court and skip the local process.
• whether to allow guns on college campuses and dorms, in athletic stadiums and public parks and beaches.
• whether to exempt firearms, fire arm accessories, and ammunition manufactured in New Hampshire from federal law and regulation. A yes vote on this bill additionally made a state or federal official, who enforced a lawful federal regulation, guilty of a misdemeanor or felony.
• whether to eliminate licensing requirements for N.H. residents to own and carry firearms such as pistols and revolvers, "whether openly or concealed, loaded or unloaded."
• whether to overturn established law that prohibited carrying loaded rifles and shotguns in vehicles.
• whether to allow any person, meeting certain statutory requirements, to carry a firearm, openly or concealed, loaded or unloaded, on or about their person or upon or in a vehicle, whether or not such person possesses a license, permit, or other authorization to carry a firearm. This bill also removed the requirement that non-residents obtain a license to possess a firearm while in New Hampshire.
• whether to allow the use of firearms and fireworks in crowded, heavily populated cities and towns.

The President said that now is the time for action. Then he read the names of 20 children murdered on Friday. They were 1st graders.

I have a 1st grader who is happy to have a snow day today and looking forward to Christmas next week. He is excited about learning Math and reading new books. He is sweet and competitive and stubborn and innocent and I will not stand to hear an elected official justify compromising his safety by hiding behind the 2nd Amendment.

We have a voice and we can use it. I don't want to struggle again with the decision of whether or not to tell my 7 & 9 year old about another mass shooting in a school or a mall or a movie theater. I'm using my voice to talk about this and I beg you to use yours.

Find your elected representatives here: http://votesmart.org/. Write to your state reps, your Governor, your Congressmen and your Senators.  

As the President asked last night-"What choice do we have?"

Kool-Aid

Newmarket recently received its permit from the EPA, which gave us a discharge limit of 3 mil of nitrogen per liter for our wastewater treatment plant. (I'm pretty sure that we currently discharge about 30 mil/l, so we have our work cut out for us.) Newmarket has been involved in a coalition of Seacoast towns fighting the EPA guidelines, but it was reported yesterday that we will comply with the new limits. From reading the article in the Exeter Newsletter, it sounds as though this buys us both a little time and a little good will. Not to mention, it allows us to avoid a costly legal battle AND most importantly, do our part to protect Great Bay.

Now we are faced with building a multi-million dollar water treatment facility. 

So much of this has been under wraps because of legal concerns, but now I hope that we will work closely with neighboring towns to try and share this burden. 

When Don Jutton said that Newmarket couldn't go it alone, he wasn't only talking about the school, right? 

Right??

Town Council Recap

From last night's Town Council meeting:

"We need a different form of government."-John Bentley. 
I get the weirdest vibe when they talk about this. It generally starts to come up when the school is being talked about and in reference to giving the "Town" more power. There's always been tension between the "Town" and the "School" but it seems to be at an all-time high right now. 

The chatter at Town Council meetings about our form of government in Newmarket has been building for a while. Last night the Council approved a resolution to put the question to voters to establish a Charter Commission. 

I'm looking forward to the discussion about this at the public hearing.

"We have zero authority over the school. I'm not saying it's right, I'm saying it's what it is."-Phil Nazzaro. 
See? 

"It's a judgement call of the Council." -Steve Fournier
In reference to the request of the school to use impact fees designated for the school to buy out the lease on the modulars at the Elementary School. After the last TC meeting, Mr. Fournier requested more legal opinions and ended up back where he started. 

"It really depends on the Council and what they consider permanent." -Christine Blouin. 
Ms. Blouin did a great job explaining the need and making the case for the permanence of the modulars.

"It's a classroom. I have no problem with this." Dan Wright. 
Enough said. 

"Motion passes 5-1."
Thank you. 

Feedback

Since starting this blog, I've received emails and phone calls from various Town Councilors and others. Sometimes it's to add information about a subject that I didn't know, give me history on a particular topic, ask me to write about something or just to generally "set me straight."

While I've never asked people to contact me, I expect some response to the things I write. This is my blog, we live in a small town and I don't hide behind any kind of fake identity. Heck, my picture is right on the page. 

It's generally been a positive experience (even if the feedback hasn't always been.)

That's why I was surprised when Mike LaBranche suggested on Facebook that I should talk to him and Al Zink "prior to expressing your opinions." He went on to ask if I had sat down with "Adam or Josh to discuss your concerns with their voting record. I am sure there are reasons for everything that they did that you did not agree with." And then followed it up with "I guess shoot first, ask questions later is followed by more people than I thought." 

Seriously?

While I do my best to present factual information, I don't pretend to be a reporter and I've never suggested that this is anything other than my opinion - an opinion that I have tried to express in a balanced way. This is a blog, remember. 

I know that criticism can be hard hear, but since when is it not OK to question our elected officials? 

How they respond is up to them.

Efficiency?

I walked into the Budget Committee meeting a few minutes late and the presentation by the Efficiency Committee was already underway. I missed the opening, but it was clear that Bob Coffey had distributed his "Worst Case Tax Scenario", a document that seems intent on terrifying all homeowners. To give you an idea, one of the "Worst Case Scenario" items includes a $75 million new school with no state aid. I may have missed something at the start of the meeting, but where  this red herring came from is a mystery to me.

Here's what I understand based on my very limited participation in the Efficiency Committee and general attendance at meetings over the last several months: the Efficiency Committee has been spearheaded by Mr. Coffey, Mike LaBranche and Al Zink who sought to find "efficiencies" between the Town and School (hence the name.) They have expressed the desire to work together as a community rather than two separate entities so that we can identify our needs and do our best to plan for the future as a whole.

Sounds great.

Unfortunately, as Mr. Zink pointed out they didn't have the support of the community. Huh.

Let me point out a few things.

1. For a group that is about 2 elected bodies working together, shouldn't it be represented by both groups? Every time I encountered the Efficiency Committee, it was clearly being run by Mr. Zink, Mr. Coffey and Mr. LaBranche. Having an active School Board member would have been a good start to getting buy in from that segment of the community. 
2. You can't talk about working together and be accusatory at the same time. It just doesn't work. A lot of things were said without being said out loud and it was clear that the Efficiency Committee (read Mr. Coffey, Mr. Zink and Mr. LaBranche) thinks the School Board didn't do enough (even though it's supposedly a representative committee of both the Town and School. Or is it?)
3. Is it a failure just because it didn't work out the way you wanted it to or as quickly as you would have liked? I don't think so.

I see value in the pursuits of the Efficiency Committee, even if I don't see our future to be as dire as Mr. Coffey has described. I hope this group can accept that they have helped to start the process but they have a long way to go. Only collaboration will lead to true change. 

This Week

Important meetings this week:

• Monday-Budget Committee meeting at 6:30 in Town Hall. Find the agenda here.
• Wednesday-Facilities Committee meeting at 5:30 in Town Hall.

Also- one of my favorite resources, Defending NH Public Education, has had a makeover (and a name change). It's now called Advancing New Hampshire Public Education and it is a great resource to keep up to date with happenings in Concord related to public education.

Have a great week!

Time flies when you're....

It's been a year since a sudden - and somewhat unexpected - tax rate took most homeowners in Newmarket by surprise. A very long year.

In the wake of that particular tax hike, Facebook forums were created and groups were formed. People fought hard to ensure that we would have options for our school facilities and lots of people started to pay attention. I started this blog to try and connect the dots as much for me as for others.  

During a recent school board meeting, many people got up to support programs that they care about which were cut from the budget for the next fiscal year. I applaud all of those people for attending the meeting and getting involved. Sometimes it just takes one issue to get you hooked.

So now I ask that you stay involved.

The budget process starts for real on Monday with the first meeting of the budget committee. Both the Town and the School budgets are with them now, but as citizens we still have a voice in the process (not to mention a vote.) The Budget Committee answers to us, the citizens of Newmarket. 

As I've said before, I'm not sure that those program cuts are save-able this year, but let's not kid ourselves, further cuts are on their way.

And while we won't have a building project on the ballot this year, there could be something about a possible agreement with Oyster River down the road and we all need to make sure that we have the facts and weigh that decision very carefully. 

So, what to do?

• Start attending meetings. Meetings are posted on the Town website and I'll do my best to write about upcoming meetings here. We must hold our elected officials accountable. 
• "Like" Newmarket Solutions on Facebook--a lot of info will get passed on that way. Also visit the Newmarket Solutions website for accurate information. Solutions can be created when we all come together.
• Send emails/letters to School Board, Town Council and Budget Committee members as needed. Let your voice be heard.
• Talk to your friends and neighbors.
• Attend the Deliberative Session in February. There will be much more info to follow about what the Deliberative Session is and why it's important.
• Vote in March. 

Thanks for paying attention.

Cuts (take 2)

At the school board meeting last night people rallied behind a couple of the proposed cuts-the Enrichment position at the Elementary School and the School to Coordinator position at the Jr. Sr. High School. Other cuts include (but this isn't a complete list) a SPED coordinator, 2 paraprofessionals and a reading specialist. 

Honestly, I'm a mess about all of this. 

Every time I started to think about what to say in defense of the Enrichment program (a program both of my boys have benefited from) I kept coming back to one thing: What's next? As much as I want to think that we can salvage these positions, I'm not sure that it's possible. And as sad as that makes me, I shudder to think about what's coming.  

I believe in public education and support the right for ALL students to get an adequate education, including mine--and I don't believe that squeezing every dime out of the budget is responsible. We're not talking about a road that isn't getting paved or a water main that isn't getting flushed. We're talking about our kids.

The School Board is attempting to balance the roles of overseeing the education of our children while being good stewards of our tax dollars and I see their dilemma. But it's not OK to tell our teachers and kids to do more with less. If we continue down this path, where will we be in 2 years? 5 years? 10 years? 

Chipping away little by little, year after year continues to dilute the quality of education that we provide in Newmarket, but we can decide when we've had enough.

People stood up in defense of these positions last night and I want to make sure that those people know that last night is just the beginning of this process. Cliff Chase outlined the budget procedure and there will again be time for public input. It is important for people to attend the budget meetings, attend the deliberative session and then to vote in March. It's going to take a little work, but it can be done.

An important reminder: it's not up to the budget committee to make the final decision--it's up to the voters. 

Town Council Recap

Just a couple thoughts from last night's meeting:

• Apparently the councilors were treated to a photograph of a gunky pipe that was quite shocking. As they talked about it, Sean Grieg (I'm not sure what his title is, but I like to think of him as the water guru) said that the build up is the result of not having the ability to flush the mains. Not spending money on preventive maintenance and having it come back to bite us in the form of a costly project...well, at least we're consistent. I'm just glad that my drinking water isn't flowing through that pipe. 

• "I'm upset."-Mr. Carmichael.  Let me just say that I'm starting to really like Ed Carmichael. Last night, Dr. Hayes presented a request to use ~$56,000 in impact fees to the Town Council for the purpose of buying out the lease on the Elementary School modulars. This was on the agenda, after being pushed to the workshop session from the last meeting in order for the Council to have the opportunity to discuss it.  But last night they were faced with a legal opinion that everyone agreed was very vague. As Mr. Carmichael pointed out, there was time to work on this and he was upset that they couldn't give Dr. Hayes an answer. The Town Administrator really should have sought clarification from the attorney and the issue could have been resolved last night.  I will point out that most councilors seemed supportive of the school's use of the fees and they were just looking for clarification-I just wish that had been done in advance. 

• After a lot of talk about what they could and couldn't say and if they should or shouldn't talk about wastewater, our water guru Sean Grieg gave a presentation about sewer rates and the proposed wastewater treatment plant guidelines. I am not a water user and admit that this doesn't affect me and because of that I haven't given much thought to the water/sewer use rates. One thing is certain--they are going to go up and by quite a lot. Along with how Newmarket rates could go up, Sean presented a comparison of other towns' rates. I admit that sometimes I fixate on weird details, but what really struck me is that right now Durham is paying almost a dollar less than Newmarket and they are already discharging <8 milligrams per liter of nitrogen (one of two magic numbers that we are trying to reach per the EPA guidelines). Why are they paying less than us now and not faced with a multi million dollar upgrade in the near future? Because, according to Sean, they did it a long time ago and probably got state funding to do it. Sound familiar?

Cuts

I just wrote this line in an email to someone:
"Something's gotta go, so what do you want that to be?"

Here's one of the big differences between the school budget and the town budget---when we start talking about cuts to the school budget, we are talking about programs that make a difference to our kids' education. And yeah, parents tend to get a little emotional about that.

I honestly don't envy the school board right now. 

The most wonderful time.

This is a busy time of year. The town is waiting for the tax rate to be set and the Town Council and School Board are talking about budgets. We have several school facilities solutions being discussed and everyone is saying that they don't want their taxes to go up. With that in mind, I thought I would point out some important upcoming meetings:

• PTA Meeting--Tuesday November 13 at 6:30pm. The PTA is having their monthly meeting. Dr. Hayes will be available to PTA members to discuss school facility options and answer questions.
• Public Forum-Wednesday November 14th at 9am. Dr. Hayes has invited the community to meet at Town Hall to discuss the current school facilities options including the talks with ORSD and the various renovation and new school proposals. The architect will also be present to answer questions. 
• Town Council Meeting-Wednesday November 14th at 7pm. The Town Council will be discussing the school's request to use $58,000 of impact fees. I wrote about impact fees back in June after a request was made by the school at that time. The discussion bugged me last time and I'm interested to hear how it is discussed on Wednesday night. You can view the full meeting agenda here.
• School Board meeting-Thursday November 15th at 7pm. A couple positions are on the chopping block for next year. This is the public's opportunity to voice their concerns before we are too far into the budget process. The rumors that I heard are that the enrichment position at the elementary school and the school to career coordinator are two positions that are being considered for cutting. I guess I thought that the huge amount in savings with the health plan switch might have offset the need to make these cuts. I don't know what other cuts may have been proposed. The agenda was not posted on the website, but public comment is always welcomed at the beginning of each school board meeting.
• Public Forum-Monday November 19th at 7pm. Another community forum to discuss the school options. See above for more info.
• Budget Committee Meeting- Monday November 26th at 7pm. No agenda has been posted, but my guess is that they'll start going through both the town and school budgets. 

And there's only 42 days until Christmas...

Extra Credit

Some good news: the Newmarket Teacher's Association voted on Wednesday to switch health care providers resulting in an anticipated savings of $357,000. Yes, that's right, $357,000 IN SAVINGS.

I have a feeling that there's a lot behind this decision. I know a little about the history between the Teachers Association, the Town, the SAU, and the community and I'm pretty sure that things said by all sides have been unfair at times. 

I keep thinking about ways to write about this and take all sides into account. But for now I'm just going to say thank you to the teachers. You didn't have to make this switch, but you did it and I'm grateful. 

I hope that the community recognizes this and stands behind your efforts.

We'll be watching.

This is just the beginning. 

There are real issues facing Newmarket and our State in the coming months and years. The last several months have taught me how important it is to be informed and to hold our elected officials accountable. 

OK, Marcia, William, Michael and Patty. It's time to show us what you've got. 

One. More. Day.

Well folks, this is it. One more day until the election and no matter who wins or loses, at least we can all go back to answering our phones again.

I've spent most of the last 30 or so days talking about Adam Schroadter's and Josh Davenport's voting records. This has not been a question of whether or not these guys are nice people--they are. But being nice isn't a good enough reason for me to vote for them. Too much is at stake.

I've written that Adam Schroadter and Josh Davenport

• voted to allow guns on college campuses and in the State House
• voted against funding for drug and alcohol treatment
• voted against funding for the Head Start program 
• voted to divert taxpayer money to private and religious schools 
• voted to repeal public kindergarten 
• voted to eliminate compulsory school attendance
• voted to allow parents to object to school curriculum for any reason
• voted for the Voter ID law
• voted to eliminate gun licensing requirements 
• voted to legally allow businesses to discriminate against gay couples
• voted to defund Planned Parenthood
• voted for removing preventive health services for women from benefits expected to be covered by insurance companies
• voted to force doctors to give false information to women seeking abortions 
• voted to repeal NH's participation in RGGI
• they voted for Right to Work
• they voted to expand the death penalty

And those are just the votes I've written about. There are more. I think these votes are wrong for our town and wrong for New Hampshire.

Check out Granite State Progress to look at detailed voting records for all the candidates.

I'll be voting for Marcia Moody, Michael Cahill, William Connery and Patricia Lovejoy.

But whoever you vote for, just make sure you vote.

Resources

Still undecided? Want to know more? 

Here are some great resources:

http://www.dnhpe.org/--all about education in New Hampshire.
http://votesmart.org/-- this is a great site. You can check local and national issues/votes.
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/--this is a link to the New Hampshire State House landing page. From here, you can find out who your reps are and see their voting records.
http://www.AisFor.org/- this is a great site about women's and reproductive issues.
http://granitestateprogress.org/ - look up your reps here. Find out how they voted on issues important to you.

Know who you're voting for!

3 Days

With just a few days to go, Seacoast Media has been endorsing candidates for the local state races. I read both the Herald and the News-Letter so I was shocked to see that they endorsed Adam Schroadter and Josh Davenport on Friday. Here's the quote:

Both are fiscal conservatives who want to grow New Hampshire's economy while watching out for existing small businesses. They will work hard for solutions to education funding initiatives such as school building aid as Newmarket faces a tough road ahead in renovating or building a new Newmarket Junior/Senior High School. They will also be a watchdog for Newmarket and other communities in the Great Bay watershed as they face hundreds of millions of dollars in potential upgrades to waste water treatment plants being mandated by the Environmental Protection Agency.

I was surprised because one of the first parts of the paper I read is the editorial and I tend to agree with many of the things written there. I don't think that anyone would argue that the paper tends to lean a little to the left and so do I. 

Yes, they are both fiscally conservative. No, I haven't seen any funding initiatives to help assist with school building aid or education in general. Both have voted in favor of the moratorium on school building aid and to support voucher systems, eliminating kindergarten and eliminating compulsory school attendance. These measures won't help Newmarket schools.

So I'm left wondering, do you read your own paper? Perhaps you missed...

• An editorial denouncing lack of services for mentally ill. Guess who voted to cut that funding?
• An editorial praising Gov. Lynch for recognizing the importance of education and training. Guess who voted against the community college system and voted for severe cuts to the university system?
• An editorial denouncing the voter suppression campaign in New Hampshire among students and the Voter ID law in general. Guess who supported those bills?
• An editorial denouncing HB 1264--a bill that would legalize discrimination against gay and lesbians. 
• And in another opinion piece about this controversial legislation that only 85 house members voted for Shir Haberman wrote: "With all state representatives up for election this fall it is good to remember the eight legislators, all Republicans, who represent Seacoast communities and were among the bill's supporters, and to vote accordingly in November. They were Paul Brown and Kathleen Hoelzel of Raymond, Joshua Davenport and Adam Schroadter of Newmarket, Amy and Lawrence Perkins of Seabrook, Kenneth Weyler of Kingston and William Smith of New Castle."
• An editorial denouncing the repeal of New Hampshire's involvement with RGGI. Guess who voted in favor of that?

Maybe Seacoast Media Group should follow it's own advice and take a harder look at the records of the candidates it endorses. 

Back to school.

While everyone has been busy thinking about the upcoming presidential elections, our Superintendent and School Board have continued to work toward finding solutions for our school facilities.

Here's what's been happening:

• Dr. Hayes, Principal Chris Andriski and members of the school board met with representatives from Oyster River School District on Monday, October 22, to discuss tuitioning Newmarket students to ORSD. According to the information presented by Dr. Hayes, they discussed multiple scenarios including tuitioning High School kids, tuitioning Jr. and Senior High kids and a Co-op agreement. They did not discuss any details about what any of these agreements might look like. ORSD has been working on a demographic study to determine what their capacity is and will be in future years (basically looking to see if there would be enough room for our kids) and they were hoping to have the results of that study by the end of October, but Dr. Hayes had not received that info as of last night's board meeting. ORSD is also talking to other districts. 

• At the Facilities Committee meeting on Tuesday Dr. Hayes presented this info along with plans for both a Renovation/Addition project and a new school (both with and without an auditorium). There was some great discussion around these proposals and I hope that the discussion will continue with the larger community. (See info below)

• At last night's School Board meeting there was some discussion around how to proceed with the Fire and Life Safety concerns at the Jr. Sr High School. Dr. Hayes suggested that the SB should make a decision about whether or not to move forward with making plans for to address these concerns. The sense I got was that he doesn't want next summer to roll in and us get caught with our pants down because we suddenly have to scramble to get the work completed by the September 2015 deadline. The SB asked some good questions and raised valid concerns. It looks like they will continue this discussion at another meeting and they plan to include the architect and Chief Malasky to, if nothing else, just get everyone on the same page.

• Another issue brought up at last night's SB meeting has to do with Impact fees, which I've written about before. The SB is again requesting impact fees be released--this time for buying out the lease on the modulars at the elementary school. It looks like our 3 year plan for those is turning into a much longer plan and this will save us money in the end. This is on the Town Council's agenda for their November 7th meeting--hopefully the discussion will go smoothly.

• Lastly, Dr. Hayes announced 2 public forums where he will discuss the school options. Here is his message:  

I am scheduling a number of meetings and forums during the month of November to discuss with members of the community the options being considered for better facilities for our Jr/Sr High School. The Facilities Committee and I would like to hear your thoughts on the possibility of sending grades 6-12 to Oyster River for their education and your thoughts on the several options for building a new school in Newmarket. On Tuesday, November 13th, I will be speaking at the Elementary School’s PTA meeting at 6:30 PM. Public forums have been scheduled for Wednesday, November 14th, at 9 AM and Monday, November 19th, at 7 PM, both meetings to be held in the Town Council Chamber. Our architects will be joining us at these meetings. I also will be available to meet with Jr/Sr High faculty, staff, and administration on November 13th at 2:45 PM. I plan to meet with a number of student advisory groups between November 6th and 28th. I sincerely hope that citizens, parents, students and employees can find time to participate in one of these sessions. If you have any questions, feel free to email me at jimhayes@newmarket.k12.nh.us.

If you're looking for more info, please visit http://newmarketsolutions.org/  and check out the Newmarket Solutions Facebook page to stay as informed as possible on these important issues.

5 Days

The recent hurricane has a lot of people thinking about the environment and I'm no different.  Today's post centers around HB 519, which repeals New Hampshire's Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI).

According to ConservationNH, RGGI is a "regional market-based program designed to reduce air pollution at the lowest cost. It was instituted by ten northeastern states to help limit carbon emissions, encourage innovation in alternative energy, and improve energy efficiency."

The Republican led House passed HB 519, repealing New Hampshire's participation in this program. Ten leading environmental organizations signed a letter in opposition to the bill: 

"The repeal of this important program is shortsighted, would undermine the state's environmental and energy goals, is not in the best interest of ratepayers, and would create an atmosphere where New Hampshire citizens would question the Legislature's commitment to reducing carbon emissions and our reliance on foreign oil. Rather than repeal, we urge a careful and thorough review of the RGGI program in order to make any needed reforms."

The conversation around RGGI is complicated. Here are a few articles and resources to better understand the program: 
http://conservationnh.org/climate-energy/a-rggi-primer/
http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/air/tsb/tps/climate/rggi/index.htm
http://www.seacoastonline.com/articles/20120611-NEWS-206110317
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regional_Greenhouse_Gas_Initiative

Adam Schroadter and Josh Davenport both voted to withdraw from RGGI.

6 Days

"When the next legislative session opens, it is critical that lawmakers restore to the state's university and community college systems the funds they cut in the last session." --from this editorial on Seacoastonline pointing out why education and training matter to New Hampshire's economy.

According to Granite State Progress, Adam Schroadter and Josh Davenport voted against funding to restore the community college system of New Hampshire and Josh Davenport voted for an amendment that would cut an additional $2.4 million from the New Hampshire University System budget after it had already been cut by $48 million.* 


*Adam Schroadter was listed as "Not Voting" on this amendment.

A fair trade?

I sat at the Candidate's forum with my question in my hand. I hesitated to get up in the beginning, and was later beat to the microphone for the last couple of questions. My question involved women's rights, something that was barely mentioned during the 2 hour event so I left a little disappointed.

But I listened and it's taken a few days to decide how to put words to my feelings.

A theme that I've noticed lately (at the candidate's forum and in conversations with friends) is a separation between the economy and the "social agenda."

During the forum Adam Schroadter said that he was running as a pro-business candidate. He mentioned oyster farming, relaxing restrictions on home beer brewing and supporting the Polish Club in town as examples of his record. Sounds good, right?

But both he and Josh Davenport failed to mention their voting records on social issues.

So we get more oysters and home brewed beer in exchange for limited access to health care, dismantling women's rights, diverting money from public schools to private and religious schools, an expansion of the death penalty, guns in the Statehouse, legalized discrimination, a cumbersome and unnecessary voter ID law, guns on college campuses and a repeal of universal kindergarten. 

It's not just Newmarket. Ovide Lamontagne opposes gay marriage, opposes legal abortion, opposes funding for planned parenthood, supports turning Medicare into a voucher system, supports privatizing public education and supports abolishing the Department of Education while running as someone who will improve the state economy.

And it's even more obvious on the national stage--when my Republican friends tell me that they are socially liberal but are voting for Romney because of the economy they're basically saying lowering my taxes is more important than my GLBT friends, women's control over their own bodies or how we educate our kids. But he's a business guy, so it's ok?

What's hard for me to reconcile is that it's not like it's all or nothing with the economy--I hear people say that the recovery just hasn't happened fast enough or been strong enough or taxes aren't low enough. 

We can debate how much we should pay in taxes. I get that. 

But I'm not willing to debate what I can do with my body. Or what you can do with yours.

All candidates are pro-business. It's what they are "anti" that we can't ignore. 

9 Days

Right To Work
From Granite State Progress:

The New Hampshire General Court voted on whether to pass HB 474, the so-called "Right to Work" bill that would have jeopardized job-based health insurance, pensions and worker safety programs - important foundations for a healthy and productive work place that have largely been secured by organized work forces. The bill sought to interfere in private work place matters and bar employers and workers from arranging a fair share clause in contracts to help cover the collective bargaining costs of negotiating good jobs with good wages and benefits.(HB474, Roll Call #182, 5/4/2011)

This legislation has been criticized by opponents as anti-union and supporters have called it "worker freedom." You can read more about Right To Work here, here and here.

Adam Schroadter and Josh Davenport both voted in favor of this bill. 
Marcia Moody and Patty Lovejoy voted against it.

10 Days

Today my usual routine of "wake up and work on my blog post" was replaced by "wake up and work on my son's Halloween costume." 

I'm using that as my official excuse for not writing a proper blogpost today.

But the truth is, I have a lot on my mind. There's the school issues here in Newmarket. I'm still processing the Candidate's Forum from the other night. And I read this article in the Huffington Post that has really stuck with me--I urge you to read it.

10 days.....

12 Days

Balance. When people talk about balancing the budget, I focus on the word "balance."

I imagine that one has to take a hard look at programs and make cuts where necessary, even if they are painful. And in order to further balance the budget, I imagine that it's necessary to find ways to bring in more revenue.

The current legislature did not BALANCE the budget, they CUT the budget, sacrificing programs and services and downshifting costs to towns like Newmarket. 

One example of this is reducing the cigarette tax. The legislature planned on an increase in sales which would offset the decrease in taxes even though it was ill-advised and hadn't worked in other states as reported in this article in the NY Times.

It didn't work. According to this article in The Eagle Tribune, the Department of Administrative Services show a $20.1 million drop in tobacco tax revenues. But to me, the kicker comes at the end of the article:

"But within 24 hours of the tax cut, manufacturer's raised prices 10 cents a pack--negating the benefit."

Adam Schroadter and Josh Davenport supported reducing the cigarette tax--forgetting all about balance.

According to the Times article, "the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids estimates that if the New Hampshire cut were enacted it would mean more than $21 million in long-term health costs. The campaign also estimates a 10-cent drop per pack would result in 1,000 new young smokers in New Hampshire."

There was talk at last night's candidate's forum about being pro-business. 

I just wonder at whose expense?

13 Days

In just 13 days we'll cast our ballots and elect the people we want to represent us. 

Tonight is your chance to hear firsthand what the local candidates for State Representative have to say.

Come to the Candidates' forum tonight in the Town Hall auditorium. There will be an informal meet and greet from 6:30-7:00pm, followed by a formal question and answer session from 7:00-9:00pm. 

See you there!

14 Days

Representatives Adam Schroadter and Josh Davenport both voted to expand the death penalty. 

The death penalty is one of those issues that people are either for or against and I'm not going to try and change any one's minds today. What I don't understand is how 2 of our representatives can fight so hard to eliminate a woman's right to a safe, legal medical procedure claiming to want to protect life, but then vote to support expanding the death penalty. 

It just doesn't make sense to me.

15 Days

I've written twice now about gun bills and you can read those posts here and here. HB 536 is another example of the House's irresponsible policy on guns that eliminates the licensing requirement to carry a firearm.

Here's what that legislation would do:

• make a license to carry a firearm optional
• allow firearms to be carried or transported without a license --openly or concealed, loaded or unloaded
• reduces the fee for non-resident licenses from $100 to $20. 

It seems like common sense to me that a person should have a license to carry a gun, but Adam Schroadter didn't think so. He voted in favor of this bill. 

Marcia Moody and Patty Lovejoy both opposed this bill.

**Josh Davenport did not vote on this piece of legislation

16 Days

The other day I mentioned that there are 3 Constitutional amendments on the ballot. The second amendment listed has to do with judicial oversight and authorizes the New Hampshire legislature to amend Supreme Court rules. 

This is how the ballot will read:

Are you in favor of amending article 73-a of the second part of the constitution to read as follows:[Art.] 73-a. [Supreme Court, Administration.] The chief justice of the supreme court shall be the administrative head of all the courts. The chief justice shall, with the concurrence of a majority of the supreme court justices, make rules governing the administration of all courts in the state and the practice and procedure to be followed in all such courts. The rules so promulgated shall have the force and effect of law. The legislature shall have a concurrent power to regulate the same matters by statute. In the event of a conflict between a statute and a court rule, the statute, if not otherwise contrary to this constitution, shall prevail over the rule.

Like most people, I haven't read the NH constitution (although I did just google it with every intention of trying to read it, but I took one look at it and thought, maybe another day.) 

So now I have to rely on my limited recall of how the government works. I seem to remember the idea of checks and balances and that we have 3 branches of government so that no one branch can become too powerful. I just don't understand how allowing the legislature to change the rulings of the NH Supreme Court holds true to that idea. 

I plan to vote NO on Question 2.

Executive Council

Have you heard of the Executive Council?

Wikipedia describes the powers of the executive council here. But these are the basics:

• It is a 5 person state board currently made up of 5 Republicans. 
• The Executive Council approves all state contracts over $5,000
• They approve all gubernatorial appointments (judges, members of state boards and commissions, etc.)

It's 5 people with a lot of power, even though most of us don't really know what they do.

In Newmarket (and Rockingham County) we are in District 3 and I urge you to consider Bill Duncan for Executive Council. According to his website, Bill is running "to bring balance back to state government.  I would put aside the social agenda and allow state government to work on important projects that create jobs, enhance our public education system and protect New Hampshire’s precious environment."

On his website, Bill highlights many of the issues facing New Hampshire and I want to mention one here: education. I first heard of Bill through the website that he launched, Defending New Hampshire Public Education and I've been a fan ever since. He has stated that he will work toward ensuring a quality education for all New Hampshire children:

"The legislature has cut funding for higher education in half, raising tuition on middle-class families by 10 percent; cut state support for local schools, increasing local property taxes; and even tried to block local school districts from accepting federal education funds. I will work to get local school districts federal education dollars that help offset local property taxes and will support education appointees who will fight for good public schools.  I will work with the New Hampshire Department of Education to advocate for the needs of people in my district, advocate in the legislature and closely review the critically important education nominations that will come up in the next two years – the commissioner and deputy commissioner of the Department of Education, three state board of education members and university system trustees."

These are issues critical to Newmarket--we need people in Concord who will fight for us. 

19 Days

Did you know that in addition to all the federal, state and local races there are 3 additional questions on the ballot?

These are the things that get me every time. They're written in "legalese", and often receive little to no media coverage in the weeks leading up to a vote. If I haven't heard about them earlier, trying to decipher them in the voting booth isn't going to be easy.

In the hopes of alleviating some of that voting booth pressure, you can read the text of the first Constitutional amendment, CACR 13, here. 

But if you're like me, you'll take one look at that and hit the back button. Because really, who wants to read that?

This is what it will look like on the ballot on November 6th:

“Are you in favor of amending the second part of the constitution by inserting after article 5-b a new article to read as follows: [Art.] 5-c. [Income Tax Prohibited.] Notwithstanding any general or special provision of this constitution, the general court shall not have the power or authority to impose and levy any assessment, rate, or tax upon income earned by any natural person; however, nothing in this Article shall be construed to prohibit any tax in effect on January 1, 2012, or adjustment to the rate of such a tax.”

If passed, this amendment would change the NH Constitution to prohibit the creation of a personal income tax. Granite State Progress explains the problem:

"CACR 13 – which will likely be listed as Question 2 on the ballot -- seeks to fix a problem that does not exist. Neither the Governor nor the Legislature has seriously considered an income tax in recent years, while prior efforts to adopt an income tax were stopped over the course of the normal legislative process. Enshrining CACR 13 in our constitution would tie the hands of future lawmakers and deny our children and grandchildren the opportunity to decide critical public issues for themselves. We do not know what challenges New Hampshire will face in the years ahead or how future taxpayers might choose to meet them. It should be up to them to select the approach that best suits their needs and then to hold their elected officials accountable.

Furthermore, CACR 13 would freeze New Hampshire’s tax system into place, making it almost impossible to address its existing shortcomings, to reduce its dependence on business and property taxes, or to generate revenue for even the most pressing priorities. Simply updating the tax system to account for inflation could become problematic if it was deemed to involve anyone’s income."

There are many advantages to having no income tax in New Hampshire, but do we really need a constitutional amendment to help make sure we never have one? What if, down the road, an income tax in some form will help relieve the burden on property tax? Do we want to keep our options open, or do we want to eliminate them?